Read the text and try to guess the meaning of the underlined words from the context, and then complete the sentences below.
The problem with letting people off in such cases though, is that the thief does not always appreciate the fact that he has been given a chance to turn over a new leaf. Instead he might think that because he has got away with it once, he can always avoid punishment.
There are some crimes though, which are so serious that leniency would never be considered. Where a criminal does away with someone, that is to say, kills someone, it is very unlikely that a court would be lenient in any way. Another example of a very serious crime would be one involving the use of bombs or explosives where a criminal destroys a building or a car by blowing it up. In this day and age, where terrorists the world over are hell bent on striking fear into populations, this last type of crime would attract the least sympathy in any court.Many verbs in English change their meaning depending on the preposition they are combined with. These are phrasal verbs. Match the correct phrasal verb with the sentences below.
The phrasal verb “break into” used above means a burglary. Now look at some ways you can use the word break.
Break up | a relationship a fight (n) end of school term |
Break off | a relationship |
Break out | convict epidemic break out in cold sweat |
Break in/ into | Interrupt Burglar Horse |
Breakthrough | A discovery |
Breakdown | Mechanical Emotional/nervous Breakdown of costs involved |
Group 1: Verbs | |
to commit to admit to allege to testify | |
Group 2: People | Group 3: Punishment |
a jury a witness a juvenile delinquent the accused the defendant evidence a verdict a plea |
to be arrested to be accused to be charged to be convicted to be prosecuted to be put on probation to be freed on bail to be remanded in custody to be imprisoned a fine a sentence community service |
Find the best word from the table above to complete the text below.
A secondary school student has been ordered to perform 90 hours of (a) community service for cheating during an examination.
Wong Mei mei, 19, currently studying in Form Seven, (b) admitted that she had asked one of her friends to sit an examination in her place during last year’s Hong Kong Certificate of Education Examination.
Her friend, Chan Wai Kit, 20, earlier (c) admitted the charge, but changed her (d) plea on Tuesday, explaining that she had misunderstood the instructions given by the Independent Commission Against Corruption, which (e) allegedly told her she was not to discuss the case with anybody else and, therefore, had not obtained legal advice initially.
Wong was (f) freed on bail of HK$1000, and her trial has been set for June 16.
Wong will not be allowed to sit this year’s Hong Kong Advanced Level Examinations after the HKEAA stated that her examination results were not valid.
In giving his (g) sentence , Fanling magistrate Timothy Chow Hing-wai said he had been lenient because Yuen had admitted her guilt and shown remorse.
Chow said he also took into consideration the defendant’s age and his view that he believed that she would not (h) commit the same offence again.
After reviewing letters of reference from Wong’s school principal, teachers and friends, which (i) testified to her good character and her having attained good academic results, Chow said he believed this was a one off case.
“The (j) defendant has learned a lesson,’’ he said.
A spokesperson for the HKEAA said it accepted the court’s decision. She stated that it was important for examination candidates to understand that if they asked other people to sit their exams this would result in their being prosecuted for a criminal offence.